Competence to Stand Trial and Competence Restoration: The Basics-View Presentation

Video Transcription

Video Summary

In the FMI Advisor webinar on "Competence to Stand Trial and Competence Restoration," Dr. Debra Pinals, an expert in psychiatry and law, discusses the importance and processes of determining a defendant's competence to stand trial in the United States. The webinar is a resource for professionals in the criminal justice and mental health fields seeking to understand these complex legal and clinical interactions.<br /><br />Dr. Pinals outlines the legal foundations of competence to stand trial, emphasizing the constitutional rights involved, such as the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. She references the landmark Dusky v. United States case, which established criteria for evaluating competence to stand trial, focusing on a defendant's ability to consult with their lawyer and understand the proceedings.<br /><br />The presentation covers the procedures for ordering and conducting competence evaluations, which vary by state, and the possible outcomes, including findings of competence or incompetence. Dr. Pinals discusses how restoration services aim to bring defendants to a level where they can understand trial proceedings—a process that primarily involves treatment in state hospitals or emerging outpatient programs.<br /><br />She highlights challenges such as waitlists for evaluations, ethical issues in competency restoration, and the importance of not allowing defendants to languish in uncertainty due to legal ambiguities. Despite the challenges, the ultimate goal remains to ensure fair trials by restoring defendants to competence, while addressing systemic barriers in mental health and legal systems.<br /><br />Dr. Pinals encourages ongoing dialogue and exploration of ethical issues, systemic improvements, and policy interventions to better manage the growing numbers of individuals needing competence restoration services.

Keywords

competence to stand trial

competence restoration

Dr. Debra Pinals

psychiatry and law

criminal justice

mental health

Dusky v. United States

constitutional rights

competence evaluations

ethical issues